#FREY WILLE RUSSIAN COLLECTION REGISTRATION#
#FREY WILLE RUSSIAN COLLECTION VERIFICATION#

776831 (priority under Paris Convention on December 3, 2001) and International Registration Trademark FREY WILLE, No. The Complainant is the proprietor of several registrations and applications of design rights and registered trademarks containing the mark FREY WILLE, such as International Registration Trademark M.FREY WILLE, No. The Complainant registered and owns a large number of domain names containing the mark FREY WILLE, both under generic and country-code Top Level Domains, such as, ,, ,, and.

According to company's register of Vienna, Austria, the first registration of the company name “FREY WILLE”, GmbH &Co. Friedrich Wille, the current owner of the company. The mark FREY WILLE is based on the names of Michaela Frey, the founder of the company, and Dr. Remarkable advertisements and press reports have been made in 20 for the mark FREY WILLE and since the 1990s the Frey Wille products are marketed by catalogues which are given to many customers worldwide. The Complainant is a global player in the luxury jewelry sector and has many shops around the world, including in the Russian Federation where the Respondent resides. The production is situated in Vienna, Austria from where the in-house artists, goldsmiths, designers and experts of fine enameling create timeless masterpieces of decorative art. The Complainant is a manufacturer of luxury jewelry. D2007-1836), decides that the language of the administrative proceedings is English. D2007-0749 Laboratoire Biosthétique Kosmetik GmbH & Co. Therefore the Panel, taking into account the circumstances of this case and a number of recent UDRP proceedings and the reasons cited therein ( BrandStrategy, Inc. Pursuant the Rules, paragraph 11, in absence of an agreement between the parties, the language of the administrative proceeding shall be the language of the registration agreement. The registrar indicated that the specific language of the registration agreement as used by the Respondent for the disputed domain name is English. The Respondent did not submit in this question any response. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7.Īs the Registration Agreement for the disputed domain name is in English, the Complainant requests the Panel to decide the language of the administrative proceedings in this case is English. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Center appointed Ladislav Jakl as the sole panelist in this matter on April 23, 2010. Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent's default on April 19, 2010. The Respondent did not submit any response. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5(a), the due date for Response was April 14, 2010. In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2(a) and 4(a), the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on March 25, 2010. The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).

#FREY WILLE RUSSIAN COLLECTION VERIFICATION#

transmitted by email to the Center its verification response, confirming that the Respondent is listed as the registrant and providing the contact details. a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On March 24, 2010, the Center transmitted by email to, Inc. The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on March 22, 2010. The disputed domain name is registered with, Inc. The Respondent is Den Gledenov of Dubna, Russian Federation. The Complainant is Frey Wille GmbH & Co KG of Vienna, Austria, represented by Schönherr Rechtsanwälte GmbH, Austria. WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Frey Wille GmbH & Co KG v.

Frey wille russian collection